Rendered at 19:16:49 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Cloudflare Workers.
cmiles8 42 minutes ago [-]
Probably the bigger headline here is that they’ve blown past OpenAI in revenue and valuation, with OpenAI looking increasingly shaky and vulnerable.
alecco 10 minutes ago [-]
Anthropic is at the mercy of 3rd party datacenter contracts. AFAIK OpenAI will soon run mostly on on their own GPUs.
I don't like Altman and I am still upset about his memory deal last year but he prepared for the current shortages months before anybody else. Meanwhile, Anthropic seems to lack any plans besides third party contracting. IMHO they got very lucky with xAI and Google having spare capacity and willing to rent it. But what about next year?
lumost 6 minutes ago [-]
Which also leaves OpenAI vulnerable to NVidia's aggressive pricing. To my knowledge Anthropic is relatively well positioned across multiple compute vendors/hardware providers.
thereitgoes456 7 minutes ago [-]
Stargate is not real.
It is not clear that running one's own datacenter is a competitive advantage. Why do you think OpenAI can handle that?
wslh 4 minutes ago [-]
This business and financial race is probably the craziest in human history, so zig-zags are expected. One company may take advantage on one curve while another is stuck in the pits.
ignoramous 27 minutes ago [-]
How? OpenAI and Antrophic are basically the Big 2 racing away at light speed; the others who can't get near them are may be shaky and vulnerable. And sure, there's a garden full of those.
andriy_koval 2 minutes ago [-]
Google likely has its market share too, you can track how fast Cloud revenue increased.
cmiles8 23 minutes ago [-]
Because the market almost certainly can’t support two foundation model labs given the increasingly little difference across models and the massive sums of cash required to keep it all going. There is no big 2, just a race to survive and be the big 1.
dchftcs 11 minutes ago [-]
China will make sure they have a frontier lab, there's plenty of chance for Google to catch up once the compute crunch gets more serious.
solenoid0937 16 minutes ago [-]
Not sure this is true, both are coexisting fine today.
13 minutes ago [-]
an0malous 11 minutes ago [-]
It probably can't support any because there's no moat and smaller, open source models are catching up. This is like investing $1T into mainframe computers in 1980.
ripvanwinkle 24 minutes ago [-]
[dead]
fontain 31 minutes ago [-]
I’m not so sure. We only need to look at Uber’s example of companies realizing they’re spending way too much and trying to rein it in. Claude has excellent revenue but it is highly dependent on very rich technology companies continuing to spend lavishly without seeing returns. The music will stop at some point and Anthropic will be hit the hardest. OpenAI may have less revenue but it is distributed across many, many more customers and use cases, it’s resilient. And even if Anthropic do, somehow, manage to keep their customers spending huge amounts on Claude, they’re very vulnerable to being undercut by OpenAI given codex is pretty much at parity. Anthropic seems more vulnerable to me.
Archonical 26 minutes ago [-]
I think it's somewhat guaranteed that the music will at least die down a little bit. We saw this with cloud companies being bitten by cloud cost optimization initiatives. I can't imagine we won't see the same with AI, especially as the workforce stops trying to tokenmaxx to save their role.
Gomotono 22 minutes ago [-]
If you look at the adoption curve of Claude, I don't think we have reached anything near peak.
Analemma_ 26 minutes ago [-]
Every week there's at least one post on the HN front page bitching about API errors from Claude because Anthropic doesn't have enough serving capacity. I really don't see any signs they're "spending too much", the actual evidence on the ground seems to be exactly the opposite: constant exasperation that they're not spending enough.
newaccountman2 22 minutes ago [-]
What he means is the customers realizing they are spending too much on Anthropic.
fontain 22 minutes ago [-]
I mean Anthropic’s customers are spending too much on Claude. Anthropic’s customers are encouraging tokenmaxxing amongst their employees; measuring employees by token usage. That’s great for Anthropic’s short term revenue numbers but terrible long term because at some point companies will realize tokenmaxxing is not good. OpenAI is much less exposed to tokenmaxxing, which is a good thing.
solenoid0937 2 minutes ago [-]
> at some point companies will realize tokenmaxxing is not good
Why? Have we figured out the limits of what agents can do?
> OpenAI is much less exposed to tokenmaxxing
I don't think this is true, from my own experience & chatting with my acquaintances.
25 minutes ago [-]
GenerWork 48 minutes ago [-]
As someone who knows admittedly knows nothing about startup funding rounds, how many more rounds of funding can they do before an IPO? Is it effectively infinite?
tomwheeler 39 minutes ago [-]
Effectively infinite. Databricks is a good example. They're still private after 13 years and closed a Series L round last year. Stripe is similar.
Having been through an IPO before, it was good for employee liquidity, but bad for the culture and long-term success of the company.
charlie0 36 minutes ago [-]
Dead capital. There's no need for public funding until they are reasy to cash out at the top, if ever.
solenoid0937 5 minutes ago [-]
How do investors cash out? Do they sell to new round investors?
misiti3780 36 minutes ago [-]
so how do stripe employees get liquidity? can anyone sell their secondary shares?
tomwheeler 28 minutes ago [-]
I can't speak for the specific case of Stripe, but it's fairly common for private companies to have a "tender offer" in which employees have the opportunity to sell some portion of their equity. This is often done in conjunction with a new investment round.
(secondary markets are sometimes an option, depending on stock restrictions)
clint 34 minutes ago [-]
Stripe might buy back the shares at a good price. They might be able to sell on secondary markets.
dkdcdev 45 minutes ago [-]
I believe the canonical example is Databricks on round L
nerdsniper 40 minutes ago [-]
I believe Databricks series L round raised $4B in late 2025, but earlier this year they raised another $5B so technically they've maybe completed series M round and are "on" series N round now? The press releases are a bit confusing to me.
tomwheeler 37 minutes ago [-]
It's semantics, but the latest raise might have been a follow-on to Series M, not a new round (to be clear, I know nothing about their finances, just speaking from experience at another company).
jmathai 45 minutes ago [-]
I imagine there are ways for existing investors to achieve liquidity while still raising venture funding. But an IPO is "the" liquidity event and I imagine there will be pressure from investors for that.
I also imagine that venture funding rounds have a lower ceiling than the public markets - but at these rounds I'm not so sure!
ielillo 42 minutes ago [-]
usually you would go through seed funding, the series a,b, and possibly a1 and b1. If you entered c or d territory it meant that you still had a chance but vc would be following you very closely. After d, you could raise money, but it would be under very unfavorable conditions
wina 43 minutes ago [-]
they can do as many as they want. but at some point investors need/want to exit their positions and push for an IPO. That point is different for every company.
rvz 33 minutes ago [-]
Depends on the investors if they see growth. The downside is dilution. Preferably they just want the Series I as the IPO in this case.
They cannot raise forever, SpaceX has done more rounds but the timing is most important.
re-thc 45 minutes ago [-]
Yes, whatever you like
mutator 4 minutes ago [-]
This did round involve a secondary? If yes, any data to suggest that these secondaries are leading to increased spending outside of housing and propping up the local economy?
8f2ab37a-ed6c 8 minutes ago [-]
Say you join Anthropic now as an employee. What are the chances of your equity appreciating in value? I don't think we have any historical precedents to this.
iooi 26 minutes ago [-]
So close to being the first kilocorn. A unicorn = 1 billion, this is almost 1k.
someperson 16 minutes ago [-]
Hasn't SpaceX achieved that though?
And Saudi Aramco before they IPO'd
4ashga 11 minutes ago [-]
That announcement is a bit short on details. I suppose that, like in the previous rounds, there are some strings attached and they'll not get all of it at once.
Hynix is participating with a new circular deal. Hynix is also valued at $1 trillion now, which is positively insane.
This scam will implode harder that the housing bubble.
whalesalad 28 minutes ago [-]
They're going to run out of letters pretty soon.
gruez 22 minutes ago [-]
Anyone in finance should know that excel doesn't run out of letters (for columns) either. It just rolls over to AA, AB, etc.
Lionga 37 minutes ago [-]
Boys we got more subsidy for Claude Code Plans! Let the VC financed spending of 1000$ of datacenter cost for 200$ sales price continue!
heloqui 54 minutes ago [-]
[dead]
aanet 8 minutes ago [-]
I'll have some of that joint they be smokin'
/s
enraged_camel 53 minutes ago [-]
Revenue up to $47B. Looking forward to the Ed Zitron hot take on this one! No doubt he will fling more baseless accusations of fraud and other nonsense.
InsideOutSanta 33 minutes ago [-]
*run-rate revenue
Without more information, this number is impossible to interpret.
Analemma_ 22 minutes ago [-]
This has become a meme which is way out over its skis. Yes, run-rate is not the complete story, but "impossible to interpret" is way overstating the case.
vb-8448 22 minutes ago [-]
Unless you have access to Anthropics book your claim is as baseless as Ed Zitron's ...
Lionga 35 minutes ago [-]
What do they then need another $65B for? To sell 200$ plans that cost them 1000$ to fullfill.
I can have $47B in revenue if I sell something that cost $80B to produce ez pz.
Maxatar 17 minutes ago [-]
Revenue is not profit.
NewJazz 48 minutes ago [-]
[flagged]
rvz 45 minutes ago [-]
This is likely the last fund raise before going public.
You can't spell Anthropic or OpenAI without "IPO". You can remove the "c" in anthropic, reverse it and the first 3 letters is "ipo".
But you certainly can spell both of them without "AGI".
Therefore, "AGI" is a complete scam and it actually was meant to be a giant IPO.
underyx 24 minutes ago [-]
you also can't write openai without a pen
Imustaskforhelp 12 minutes ago [-]
I think your conclusion might be right that AGI does just feel a bunch of hype but the reasoning in middle feels flawed...
like how 13^2=169 and 31^2=961 or 10^2+11^2+12^2=13^2+14^2
I don't like Altman and I am still upset about his memory deal last year but he prepared for the current shortages months before anybody else. Meanwhile, Anthropic seems to lack any plans besides third party contracting. IMHO they got very lucky with xAI and Google having spare capacity and willing to rent it. But what about next year?
It is not clear that running one's own datacenter is a competitive advantage. Why do you think OpenAI can handle that?
Why? Have we figured out the limits of what agents can do?
> OpenAI is much less exposed to tokenmaxxing
I don't think this is true, from my own experience & chatting with my acquaintances.
Having been through an IPO before, it was good for employee liquidity, but bad for the culture and long-term success of the company.
https://www.investor.gov/introduction-investing/investing-ba...
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/tender_offer
https://carta.com/learn/equity/liquidity-events/tender-offer...
https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&qu...
(secondary markets are sometimes an option, depending on stock restrictions)
I also imagine that venture funding rounds have a lower ceiling than the public markets - but at these rounds I'm not so sure!
They cannot raise forever, SpaceX has done more rounds but the timing is most important.
And Saudi Aramco before they IPO'd
Hynix is participating with a new circular deal. Hynix is also valued at $1 trillion now, which is positively insane.
This scam will implode harder that the housing bubble.
/s
Without more information, this number is impossible to interpret.
I can have $47B in revenue if I sell something that cost $80B to produce ez pz.
You can't spell Anthropic or OpenAI without "IPO". You can remove the "c" in anthropic, reverse it and the first 3 letters is "ipo".
But you certainly can spell both of them without "AGI".
Therefore, "AGI" is a complete scam and it actually was meant to be a giant IPO.
like how 13^2=169 and 31^2=961 or 10^2+11^2+12^2=13^2+14^2